- UNSW
- ...
- Social Policy Research Centre
- Our projects
- National treatment framework
- Home
- About us
-
Our projects
- 1800RESPECT evaluation
- A longitudinal study of the wellbeing of Amélie Housing Social and Affordable Housing Fund social housing tenants
- Accommodating the NDIS: maximising housing choice in a reformed disability sector
- Accountability and user participation in Chinese child welfare non-government organisations
- Advance statements in mental health care
- Arthritis and disability
- Assertive Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) Evaluation
- Attendant care direct funding pilot project evaluation
- Australia’s Social and Community Services Workforce
- Australian Chinese disability peer support in Sydney
- Australian Community Sector Survey 2019
- Australian Experiences of Poverty: Risk Precarity and Uncertainty during COVID-19
- Australian Framework for Financial Wellbeing
- Australia's charitable sector
- Baseline study of current and future availability of ex-service organisation advocacy services
- Best practice guide for Disability Support Providers (DSPs) employing support workers within NDIS
- Better Places Stronger Communities Project Evaluation
- Bibliographies
- Budget Standards: A new healthy living minimum income standard for low-paid and unemployed Australians
- Budget Standards for Low-Paid Families
- Building China's Welfare State – Government Purchased Services for Children
- Cannabis experiences in the ACT
- Carers and Social Inclusion: New Frameworks, Evidence and Policy Lessons
- Changing community attitudes to improve inclusion for people with disability
- Commissioning homelessness services
- Community Justice Program: process evaluation
- Community Living Supports (CLS) and the Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Evaluation
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Shining a Light on Social Transformation
- Culturally responsive disability support with Chinese clients in Sydney
- Deprivation and Exclusion among Young People
- Designing illicit drug policy solutions: the role of participation
- Disability Employment and Digital Economies
- Disability Employment and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
- DREAM Employment Network Program Evaluation
- Drug and Alcohol Services Planning Model (DASPM)
- Early Childhood Intervention Review
- Early Review of Specialist Homelessness Services Program
- Educational Pathways Program Evaluation
- Employment Arrangements in Social and Community Services (SACS) receiving Commonwealth direct funding
- Employment Model Outcomes for People with Intellectual Disability
- Enable In action research
- Engagement in early childhood education in the context of disadvantage
- Equitable Access to High Quality Early Childhood Education
- Evaluation of Drug Law Reform in the ACT
- Evaluation of Home Detention in South Australia
- Evaluation of ILC Project Our Voices, Our Lives, Our Way
- Evaluation of New Income Management in the Northern Territory
- Evaluation of outcomes for people nominated to the Integrated Services Program (ISP)
- Evaluation of Partnerships with Good Sammy Enterprises
- Evaluation of SDN Beranga Autism-specific Preschool
- Evaluation of the Child Sexual Offence Evidence Pilot
- Evaluation of the Community for Everyone project
- Evaluation of the Country Universities Centre
- Evaluation of the Development and Trialling of the InnoWell Platform
- Evaluation of the Educational Pathways Program
- Evaluation of the headspace Program
- Evaluation of the Home and Healthy Program
- Evaluation of the Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Program
- Evaluation of the Involuntary Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program
- Evaluation of the Intellectual Disability and Mental Health Hubs (IDMH Hubs)
- Evaluation of the Involuntary Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program
- Evaluation of the National headspace Program
- Evaluation of the Universal Screening and Support Pilot
- Everyday steps to prevent everyday harm of people with disability
- Experiences of families with children with disabilities in China
- Families at the Centre: Negotiating Australia's mixed market in early education and care
- Family Advocacy research
- Family day care services: co-ordination funding models
- Gender-based Occupational Segregation: A National Data Profile
- Growing Up Making Decisions
- Homelessness amongst Australian veterans
- Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Plus evaluation
- How can co-governance arrangements be used to develop better policy?
- How do place-based services evolve in a world of virtual, physical and hybrid service delivery
- Identifying opportunities to develop good practice in supported decision-making for people with disability
- IDMH NDIS Residual Functions Program evaluation
- Implementation of the NDIS in the early childhood intervention sector in NSW
- Improving alcohol and other drug policy by focussing on values
- Improving communication, coordination, and collaboration amongst alcohol and other drug treatment funders
- Income management approaches: review of evidence
- Income management in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara lands
- Insights into abuse of older people
- Integrated services project: Evaluation of cost and operational effectiveness
- Intellectual Disability Mental Health (IDMH) Strategy Consultations
- Intensive home-based support services evaluation
- Keeping women safe in their homes
- Keeping women safe in their homes: technology trial evaluation
- Left out and missing out: towards new indicators of social exclusion and material deprivation
- Lessons learnt from alcohol and tobacco for cannabis regulation
- Making a difference: building on children's perspectives on economic adversity
- Making complex interfaces work for the National Disability Insurance scheme
- Markets, migration & the work of care in Australia
- Maximising life choices of people with spinal cord injury
- Meeting the social and emotional support needs of older people using aged care services
- Models of health service delivery for people with intellectual disability
- MRCA study design framework
- My Choice Matters evaluation
- National Alliance of Capacity Building Organisations (NACBO)
- National survey of domestic violence and sexual assault workforces
- National treatment framework
- NDIS prices and the disability workforce | Social Policy Research Centre
- NDIS workforce 2020
- New Horizons: The review of alcohol and other drug treatment services in Australia
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Shining a Light on Social Transformation
- Opportunity, choice, healing, responsibility and empowerment (OCHRE) Initiatives evaluations
- Our Voice SA Reaching Out Evaluation
- Outcome evaluation of community participation grants
- Pathways to preventive care for people with severe mental illness
- Peer support practice review
- Performance measures for NSW NGO AOD Treatment Services
- Policy framework for parenting
- Poverty and inequality in Australia
- Poverty in Australia 2016
- Preventing alcohol related-harms: using comparative policy analysis to study the effects and development of local government alcohol policy
- Protecting sexually abused children in China
- Rethinking policy participation, ‘young people’ and ‘drugs’
- Review of the national disability strategy 2010-2020
- Road to employment evaluation
- Self managing NDIS packages: promising practice for people left behind
- Shared care parenting arrangements since the 2006 family law reforms
- Skilled to thrive: safeguarding support actio
- Social support for Chinese families with children with disability
- Special Disability Trusts
- Specialist Workers for Children and Young People Outcomes Evaluation
- Supported accommodation evaluation framework (SAEF)
- Supported decision making for people subject to positive behaviour support
- Supported accommodation evaluation framework (SAEF)
- Sustaining Old Age Volunteerism Among CALD Population
- The Horizons Project: An empirical analysis of alcohol and drug treatment funding, purchasing and workforce mechanisms
- The role of alcohol in the informal entertainment scene in Sydney
- Throughcare evaluation
- Towards best-practice access to services for culturally and linguistically diverse people with a disability
- Transition of respite to consumer directed care: costs, benefits and impacts
- Two carer support policy: review of the need for two care workers in a community setting
- Uniting Families Report
- Updated Budget Standards for 2024
- Whole of Community NSW AOD Prevention and Education Framework
- Women’s economic security following domestic and family violence
- Workforce issues in the NSW community services sector
- Young people and adversity: stories of resourcing and resourcefulness
- Young people with cognitive disability: Relationships and paid support
- Youth Advocate Program evaluation
- Youth exposure to and management of cyberbullying incidents in Australia
- Youth unemployment in Australia
- Study
- Research
- Contact
The Australian Government Department of Health engaged the Drug Policy Modelling Program at UNSW to develop a National Treatment Framework (NTF). This was a highly consultative project and involved engaging with multiple stakeholders including treatment providers, and consumers and their families and friends, government departments, drug and alcohol peak bodies, primary health networks, and key sector governing bodies.
A National Treatment Framework was first recommended in 2014, as part of the New Horizons: Review of Drug and Alcohol Treatment Services in Australia, to provide specific guidance relating to Commonwealth and jurisdictional roles in specialist drug and alcohol treatment planning, commissioning and monitoring. This was echoed in one of the key recommendations under the National Ice Action Strategy (NIAS), the establishment of a National Treatment Framework that clarifies government roles and improves planning across the sector to ensure that communities have the types of services that are required. The development of a National Treatment Framework is important because it would enable a nationally shared strategic vision for alcohol and other treatment and facilitate better treatment planning, commissioning and monitoring, in order to maximise the health outcomes of people with alcohol and other drug problems. A National Treatment Framework would provide the basis for effective, efficient and value for money purchasing decisions, which in turn will lead to the best possible coverage of services, in the places where need is the highest, and articulated with services funded by others.
The goal of the project was to develop and document a National Treatment Framework, with more specific aims to:
- Conduct comprehensive and thoughtful consultation with the different stakeholders
- Determine the appropriate principles to be documented in a national framework
- Ensure representation of input into the Framework from across Australian jurisdictions, and different stakeholder groups
- Develop an iterative drafting process, resulting in a final document.
Methods
The most important aspect of this work was meaningful engagement, at both scale and depth, with all stakeholders, in a practicable manner. The approach and methods provided for multiple types of input and consultation on the proposed National Treatment Framework (NTF), tailored to each stakeholder group, with a focus on ensuring buy-in and due process. These mechanisms were:
- A National Forum, during which key stakeholders will discuss, debate, and agree to the overall shape and content of the NTF. This will be an all-day face-to-face meeting, held in Sydney with around 80-100 delegates. The outcome will enable the research team to start drafting the NTF. This draft will then be used as the basis for state/territory-based focus groups
- State/territory-based focus groups, with one held in each jurisdiction. At the end of this process the research team will make appropriate modifications and adjust the draft document
- Public written submissions will be used as the data collection method to allow for further comments on the final draft. The submissions received will be reviewed by the research team and considered in light of all the other consultations before presenting a revision to the Department. Feedback from the Department will then enable finalisation for submission of the final version of the NTF.
These consultative mechanisms were supplemented with input from the Working Group and the Department of Health throughout the process. The Working Group comprised state/territory health department representatives as well as treatment representatives and was convened by the Department of Health.
- Publications
- Funding agency
- Collaborators
Australian Government Department of Health
- Kyla Holmberg, Senior Adviser, Indigenous Alcohol and Other Drugs Section, Health Branch
- Marina Bowshall, Director, Drug Policy and Population Health, Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia
- Helen Taylor, A/g Director, Alcohol and Other Drugs, Strategy, Planning and Partnerships Unit, Mental Health Alcohol and Other Drugs Branch, Department of Health
- Sylvia Engels, General Manager, Mental Health, Alcohol and Drug Directorate, Department of Health and Human Services
- Gary Kirby, Director, Prevention Services, Mental Health Commission
- Tonina Harvey, Principal Program Officer, Clinical Safety and Quality, Alcohol and Other Drugs, Centre for Population Health
- Emily Harper, ACT Department of Health
- Mark Smalley, AOD Treatment Systems Coordinator, Mental Health, Alcohol and Other Drugs Branch, Department of Health
- Tom Lyons, A/g Manager, Strategy and Policy, Drug Policy & Reform, Health & Wellbeing, Department of Health and Human Services
- Larry Pierce, CEO, Network of Alcohol and Other Drugs Agencies
- Rebecca Lang, CEO, Queensland Network of Alcohol and Other Drug Agencies