- UNSW
- ...
- Social Policy Research Centre
- Our projects
- Deprivation and Exclusion among Young People
- Home
- About us
-
Our projects
- 1800RESPECT evaluation
- A longitudinal study of the wellbeing of Amélie Housing Social and Affordable Housing Fund social housing tenants
- Accommodating the NDIS: maximising housing choice in a reformed disability sector
- Accountability and user participation in Chinese child welfare non-government organisations
- Advance statements in mental health care
- Arthritis and disability
- Assertive Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) Evaluation
- Attendant care direct funding pilot project evaluation
- Australia’s Social and Community Services Workforce
- Australian Chinese disability peer support in Sydney
- Australian Community Sector Survey 2019
- Australian Experiences of Poverty: Risk Precarity and Uncertainty during COVID-19
- Australian Framework for Financial Wellbeing
- Australia's charitable sector
- Baseline study of current and future availability of ex-service organisation advocacy services
- Best practice guide for Disability Support Providers (DSPs) employing support workers within NDIS
- Better Places Stronger Communities Project Evaluation
- Bibliographies
- Budget Standards: A new healthy living minimum income standard for low-paid and unemployed Australians
- Budget Standards for Low-Paid Families
- Building China's Welfare State – Government Purchased Services for Children
- Cannabis experiences in the ACT
- Carers and Social Inclusion: New Frameworks, Evidence and Policy Lessons
- Changing community attitudes to improve inclusion for people with disability
- Commissioning homelessness services
- Community Justice Program: process evaluation
- Community Living Supports (CLS) and the Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Evaluation
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Shining a Light on Social Transformation
- Culturally responsive disability support with Chinese clients in Sydney
- Deprivation and Exclusion among Young People
- Designing illicit drug policy solutions: the role of participation
- Disability Employment and Digital Economies
- Disability Employment and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
- DREAM Employment Network Program Evaluation
- Drug and Alcohol Services Planning Model (DASPM)
- Early Childhood Intervention Review
- Early Review of Specialist Homelessness Services Program
- Educational Pathways Program Evaluation
- Employment Arrangements in Social and Community Services (SACS) receiving Commonwealth direct funding
- Employment Model Outcomes for People with Intellectual Disability
- Enable In action research
- Engagement in early childhood education in the context of disadvantage
- Equitable Access to High Quality Early Childhood Education
- Evaluation of Drug Law Reform in the ACT
- Evaluation of Home Detention in South Australia
- Evaluation of ILC Project Our Voices, Our Lives, Our Way
- Evaluation of New Income Management in the Northern Territory
- Evaluation of outcomes for people nominated to the Integrated Services Program (ISP)
- Evaluation of Partnerships with Good Sammy Enterprises
- Evaluation of SDN Beranga Autism-specific Preschool
- Evaluation of the Child Sexual Offence Evidence Pilot
- Evaluation of the Community for Everyone project
- Evaluation of the Country Universities Centre
- Evaluation of the Development and Trialling of the InnoWell Platform
- Evaluation of the Educational Pathways Program
- Evaluation of the headspace Program
- Evaluation of the Home and Healthy Program
- Evaluation of the Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Program
- Evaluation of the Involuntary Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program
- Evaluation of the Intellectual Disability and Mental Health Hubs (IDMH Hubs)
- Evaluation of the Involuntary Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program
- Evaluation of the National headspace Program
- Evaluation of the Universal Screening and Support Pilot
- Everyday steps to prevent everyday harm of people with disability
- Experiences of families with children with disabilities in China
- Families at the Centre: Negotiating Australia's mixed market in early education and care
- Family Advocacy research
- Family day care services: co-ordination funding models
- Gender-based Occupational Segregation: A National Data Profile
- Growing Up Making Decisions
- Homelessness amongst Australian veterans
- Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Plus evaluation
- How can co-governance arrangements be used to develop better policy?
- How do place-based services evolve in a world of virtual, physical and hybrid service delivery
- Identifying opportunities to develop good practice in supported decision-making for people with disability
- IDMH NDIS Residual Functions Program evaluation
- Implementation of the NDIS in the early childhood intervention sector in NSW
- Improving alcohol and other drug policy by focussing on values
- Improving communication, coordination, and collaboration amongst alcohol and other drug treatment funders
- Income management approaches: review of evidence
- Income management in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara lands
- Insights into abuse of older people
- Integrated services project: Evaluation of cost and operational effectiveness
- Intellectual Disability Mental Health (IDMH) Strategy Consultations
- Intensive home-based support services evaluation
- Keeping women safe in their homes
- Keeping women safe in their homes: technology trial evaluation
- Left out and missing out: towards new indicators of social exclusion and material deprivation
- Lessons learnt from alcohol and tobacco for cannabis regulation
- Making a difference: building on children's perspectives on economic adversity
- Making complex interfaces work for the National Disability Insurance scheme
- Markets, migration & the work of care in Australia
- Maximising life choices of people with spinal cord injury
- Meeting the social and emotional support needs of older people using aged care services
- Models of health service delivery for people with intellectual disability
- MRCA study design framework
- My Choice Matters evaluation
- National Alliance of Capacity Building Organisations (NACBO)
- National survey of domestic violence and sexual assault workforces
- National treatment framework
- NDIS prices and the disability workforce | Social Policy Research Centre
- NDIS workforce 2020
- New Horizons: The review of alcohol and other drug treatment services in Australia
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Shining a Light on Social Transformation
- Opportunity, choice, healing, responsibility and empowerment (OCHRE) Initiatives evaluations
- Our Voice SA Reaching Out Evaluation
- Outcome evaluation of community participation grants
- Pathways to preventive care for people with severe mental illness
- Peer support practice review
- Performance measures for NSW NGO AOD Treatment Services
- Policy framework for parenting
- Poverty and inequality in Australia
- Poverty in Australia 2016
- Preventing alcohol related-harms: using comparative policy analysis to study the effects and development of local government alcohol policy
- Protecting sexually abused children in China
- Rethinking policy participation, ‘young people’ and ‘drugs’
- Review of the national disability strategy 2010-2020
- Road to employment evaluation
- Self managing NDIS packages: promising practice for people left behind
- Shared care parenting arrangements since the 2006 family law reforms
- Skilled to thrive: safeguarding support actio
- Social support for Chinese families with children with disability
- Special Disability Trusts
- Specialist Workers for Children and Young People Outcomes Evaluation
- Supported accommodation evaluation framework (SAEF)
- Supported decision making for people subject to positive behaviour support
- Supported accommodation evaluation framework (SAEF)
- Sustaining Old Age Volunteerism Among CALD Population
- The Horizons Project: An empirical analysis of alcohol and drug treatment funding, purchasing and workforce mechanisms
- The role of alcohol in the informal entertainment scene in Sydney
- Throughcare evaluation
- Towards best-practice access to services for culturally and linguistically diverse people with a disability
- Transition of respite to consumer directed care: costs, benefits and impacts
- Two carer support policy: review of the need for two care workers in a community setting
- Uniting Families Report
- Updated Budget Standards for 2024
- Whole of Community NSW AOD Prevention and Education Framework
- Women’s economic security following domestic and family violence
- Workforce issues in the NSW community services sector
- Young people and adversity: stories of resourcing and resourcefulness
- Young people with cognitive disability: Relationships and paid support
- Youth Advocate Program evaluation
- Youth exposure to and management of cyberbullying incidents in Australia
- Youth unemployment in Australia
- Study
- Research
- Contact
What is the project about?
This project aimed to understand better how young people experience poverty and other forms of social disadvantage. Its focus is on finding out more about how young people in NSW between the ages of 12 and 16 (in school years 7-10) perceive and experience material deprivation (‘missing out’) and social exclusion (‘being left out’).
The project identifies poverty as a situation where people do not have enough income to achieve a minimum standard of living. The approach drew on information provided by young people about what things they agree everyone should have – things like some pocket money each week to spend on yourself and an annual holiday with family. Using this approach means that young people themselves have a say in how their disadvantaged status is identified, measured and assessed.
These kinds of studies are often conducted on adults, so this is the first time the approach has been applied to young people in Australia.
The results provided policymakers with better information about the kinds of problems that young people encounter so that they can design better policy responses.
Where is the study happening?
The project involved a sample of young people studying in years 7-10 in NSW Government schools and some young people accessing services by The Smith Family.
Who is doing the research?
The research was based at the Social Policy Research Centre at UNSW and was led by Professor Peter Saunders, who has been researching different aspects of poverty for over three decades.
Why is this project important?
This study is important because it is the first study in Australia that adopts a child-centred view of what constitutes an acceptable minimum standard of living for young people.
In applying a living standard approach to young people in a way that embodies their own views, the findings will impact directly on how their wellbeing is understood and how it can be improved in ways that reflect their views and experiences – not only those who are themselves doing it tough but all young people.
The research highlighted the factors that are associated with the experience of different forms of social disadvantage. It also explored how it affects young people’s wellbeing, lifestyle and aspirations, and how they relate to their friends and peers, family members, the schooling system, local neighbourhood and the wider community.
The findings contributed new understandings and perspectives to the growing interest in children’s experiences of poverty. The evidence can assist schools and services in delivering what children and young people need in ways that they will use and benefit from.
How is the research being done?
There are two main components to the study.
Focus Groups: the first part of the study involved running focus groups with students in years 7-10 in a sample of NSW Government schools and with young people who are accessing some of the services provided by The Smith Family. These focus groups explored what items and activities young people think are necessary to live ‘a normal kind (or decent) life’ – things that all young people should have access to. The output informed the questions that will be asked to a much larger sample of young people in the second stage of the project.
Survey: the centrepiece of the second stage of the research was a large survey of the circumstances and views of young people conducted through schools and services for young people. These surveys will be conducted with the assistance of the NSW Department of Education and Communities and The Smith Family. The survey questionnaire asked young people about the items they have, and – if they don’t have certain items – it asked whether they would like to have them or not. It also asked young people about their overall wellbeing and life satisfaction, including asking about some basic information about themselves, their family and friends, neighbourhood and social networks. The information collected in the survey was then examined in detail by the Research Team. They used it to compare patterns of material deprivation (who is missing out on basic items) and social exclusion (who is prevented from participating economically and socially) and develop summary indicators of deprivation and exclusion.
How will the information be feedback to the community and policymakers?
The final stage of the project involved examining the policy and practice implications of the findings and disseminating the results widely to other researchers and potential users of the findings.
The project report addressed what forms of social disadvantage are most common, which groups are most affected and what the consequences are for young people – now and into the future.
These insights and recommendations were the subject of detailed discussion at a stakeholder workshop that brought together leading NSW researchers and policymakers with expertise and interest in identifying social disadvantage and its impacts. Young people were also invited to attend and participate in the workshop. Workshop participants critically assessed the approach and interpretation of the results and advise on how best to disseminate the findings and identify potential uses and users.
What if I have a complaint?
If you have a complaint about this research, please contact:
Ethics Secretariat
UNSW Sydney
Sydney NSW 2052
T: (02) 9385 4234
E: humanethics@unsw.edu.au
Any complaint you make will be investigated promptly and you will be informed of the outcome.
Can I learn the outcomes of the study?
If you would like more information about the project or join our mailing list, please email us and we will notify you of any recent publications.
- Publications
- Funding agency
- Partners/ collaborators
- NSW Department of Education
- The Smith Family
- NSW Advocate for Children and Young People
- Gill Main (University of Leeds);
- Anne Hampshire (The Smith Family);
- Robyn Bale (NSW Department of Education);
- Ruth Habgood (NSW Advocate for Children and Young People)