- UNSW
- ...
- Social Policy Research Centre
- Our projects
- The Horizons Project: An empirical analysis of alcohol and drug treatment funding, purchasing and workforce mechanisms
- Home
- About us
-
Our projects
- 1800RESPECT evaluation
- A longitudinal study of the wellbeing of Amélie Housing Social and Affordable Housing Fund social housing tenants
- Accommodating the NDIS: maximising housing choice in a reformed disability sector
- Accountability and user participation in Chinese child welfare non-government organisations
- Advance statements in mental health care
- Arthritis and disability
- Assertive Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) Evaluation
- Attendant care direct funding pilot project evaluation
- Australia’s Social and Community Services Workforce
- Australian Chinese disability peer support in Sydney
- Australian Community Sector Survey 2019
- Australian Experiences of Poverty: Risk Precarity and Uncertainty during COVID-19
- Australian Framework for Financial Wellbeing
- Australia's charitable sector
- Baseline study of current and future availability of ex-service organisation advocacy services
- Best practice guide for Disability Support Providers (DSPs) employing support workers within NDIS
- Better Places Stronger Communities Project Evaluation
- Bibliographies
- Budget Standards: A new healthy living minimum income standard for low-paid and unemployed Australians
- Budget Standards for Low-Paid Families
- Building China's Welfare State – Government Purchased Services for Children
- Cannabis experiences in the ACT
- Carers and Social Inclusion: New Frameworks, Evidence and Policy Lessons
- Changing community attitudes to improve inclusion for people with disability
- Commissioning homelessness services
- Community Justice Program: process evaluation
- Community Living Supports (CLS) and the Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Evaluation
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Shining a Light on Social Transformation
- Culturally responsive disability support with Chinese clients in Sydney
- Deprivation and Exclusion among Young People
- Designing illicit drug policy solutions: the role of participation
- Disability Employment and Digital Economies
- Disability Employment and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
- DREAM Employment Network Program Evaluation
- Drug and Alcohol Services Planning Model (DASPM)
- Early Childhood Intervention Review
- Early Review of Specialist Homelessness Services Program
- Educational Pathways Program Evaluation
- Employment Arrangements in Social and Community Services (SACS) receiving Commonwealth direct funding
- Employment Model Outcomes for People with Intellectual Disability
- Enable In action research
- Engagement in early childhood education in the context of disadvantage
- Equitable Access to High Quality Early Childhood Education
- Evaluation of Drug Law Reform in the ACT
- Evaluation of Home Detention in South Australia
- Evaluation of ILC Project Our Voices, Our Lives, Our Way
- Evaluation of New Income Management in the Northern Territory
- Evaluation of outcomes for people nominated to the Integrated Services Program (ISP)
- Evaluation of Partnerships with Good Sammy Enterprises
- Evaluation of SDN Beranga Autism-specific Preschool
- Evaluation of the Child Sexual Offence Evidence Pilot
- Evaluation of the Community for Everyone project
- Evaluation of the Country Universities Centre
- Evaluation of the Development and Trialling of the InnoWell Platform
- Evaluation of the Educational Pathways Program
- Evaluation of the headspace Program
- Evaluation of the Home and Healthy Program
- Evaluation of the Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Program
- Evaluation of the Involuntary Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program
- Evaluation of the Intellectual Disability and Mental Health Hubs (IDMH Hubs)
- Evaluation of the Involuntary Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program
- Evaluation of the National headspace Program
- Evaluation of the Universal Screening and Support Pilot
- Everyday steps to prevent everyday harm of people with disability
- Experiences of families with children with disabilities in China
- Families at the Centre: Negotiating Australia's mixed market in early education and care
- Family Advocacy research
- Family day care services: co-ordination funding models
- Gender-based Occupational Segregation: A National Data Profile
- Growing Up Making Decisions
- Homelessness amongst Australian veterans
- Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative (HASI) Plus evaluation
- How can co-governance arrangements be used to develop better policy?
- How do place-based services evolve in a world of virtual, physical and hybrid service delivery
- Identifying opportunities to develop good practice in supported decision-making for people with disability
- IDMH NDIS Residual Functions Program evaluation
- Implementation of the NDIS in the early childhood intervention sector in NSW
- Improving alcohol and other drug policy by focussing on values
- Improving communication, coordination, and collaboration amongst alcohol and other drug treatment funders
- Income management approaches: review of evidence
- Income management in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara lands
- Insights into abuse of older people
- Integrated services project: Evaluation of cost and operational effectiveness
- Intellectual Disability Mental Health (IDMH) Strategy Consultations
- Intensive home-based support services evaluation
- Keeping women safe in their homes
- Keeping women safe in their homes: technology trial evaluation
- Left out and missing out: towards new indicators of social exclusion and material deprivation
- Lessons learnt from alcohol and tobacco for cannabis regulation
- Making a difference: building on children's perspectives on economic adversity
- Making complex interfaces work for the National Disability Insurance scheme
- Markets, migration & the work of care in Australia
- Maximising life choices of people with spinal cord injury
- Meeting the social and emotional support needs of older people using aged care services
- Models of health service delivery for people with intellectual disability
- MRCA study design framework
- My Choice Matters evaluation
- National Alliance of Capacity Building Organisations (NACBO)
- National survey of domestic violence and sexual assault workforces
- National treatment framework
- NDIS prices and the disability workforce | Social Policy Research Centre
- NDIS workforce 2020
- New Horizons: The review of alcohol and other drug treatment services in Australia
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Shining a Light on Social Transformation
- Opportunity, choice, healing, responsibility and empowerment (OCHRE) Initiatives evaluations
- Our Voice SA Reaching Out Evaluation
- Outcome evaluation of community participation grants
- Pathways to preventive care for people with severe mental illness
- Peer support practice review
- Performance measures for NSW NGO AOD Treatment Services
- Policy framework for parenting
- Poverty and inequality in Australia
- Poverty in Australia 2016
- Preventing alcohol related-harms: using comparative policy analysis to study the effects and development of local government alcohol policy
- Protecting sexually abused children in China
- Rethinking policy participation, ‘young people’ and ‘drugs’
- Review of the national disability strategy 2010-2020
- Road to employment evaluation
- Self managing NDIS packages: promising practice for people left behind
- Shared care parenting arrangements since the 2006 family law reforms
- Skilled to thrive: safeguarding support actio
- Social support for Chinese families with children with disability
- Special Disability Trusts
- Specialist Workers for Children and Young People Outcomes Evaluation
- Supported accommodation evaluation framework (SAEF)
- Supported decision making for people subject to positive behaviour support
- Supported accommodation evaluation framework (SAEF)
- Sustaining Old Age Volunteerism Among CALD Population
- The Horizons Project: An empirical analysis of alcohol and drug treatment funding, purchasing and workforce mechanisms
- The role of alcohol in the informal entertainment scene in Sydney
- Throughcare evaluation
- Towards best-practice access to services for culturally and linguistically diverse people with a disability
- Transition of respite to consumer directed care: costs, benefits and impacts
- Two carer support policy: review of the need for two care workers in a community setting
- Uniting Families Report
- Updated Budget Standards for 2024
- Whole of Community NSW AOD Prevention and Education Framework
- Women’s economic security following domestic and family violence
- Workforce issues in the NSW community services sector
- Young people and adversity: stories of resourcing and resourcefulness
- Young people with cognitive disability: Relationships and paid support
- Youth Advocate Program evaluation
- Youth exposure to and management of cyberbullying incidents in Australia
- Youth unemployment in Australia
- Study
- Research
- Contact
Outcomes
This study sought to generate evidence to enable better decisions by policy makers regarding funding and purchasing of alcohol and other drug treatment in Australia. We developed and implemented an online survey for alcohol and drug treatment providers (n=207) and linked the responses to the survey (which were about their funding, contract arrangements and workforce) with more than 70,000 episodes of care for alcohol and drug treatment. Using advanced statistics (multi-level modelling) we tested whether the ways in which services were funded (such as under competitive tendering) and their workforce characteristics mattered for treatment outcomes. The most important variable was the client-to-staff ratio – more staff makes a difference. Competitive tendering was not associated with treatment outcomes. Type of profession also did not matter. We also studied the perceptions of service providers about their funding arrangements, as well as looked at performance monitoring of services. Together, all these aspects have provided valuable information for government officials who purchase alcohol and other drug treatment across Australia.
- Publications
- Funding agency
- Collaborators
- Alcohol and other drug (AOD) staffing and their workplace: examining the relationship between clinician and organisational workforce characteristics and treatment outcomes in the AOD field, opens in a new window
- Perceptions of funding and commissioning models for alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment services in Australia: a qualitative study of service providers and policymakers (in press)
- Ritter, A. van de Ven, K., Vuong T., Chalmers, J., Dobbins, T., Livingston, M. & Berends, L. (2021). Are market mechanisms associated with alcohol and other drug treatment outcomes? Addiction https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15681, opens in a new window
- Podcast, opens in a new window
- van de Ven, K., Ritter, A., Vuong, T., Livingston, M., Berends, L., Chalmers, J., & Dobbins, T. (2022). A comparison of structural features and vulnerability between government and nongovernment alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment providers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 132, 108467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108467
- van de Ven, K. Ritter, A., Berends, L., Chalmers, J. & Lancaster, K. (2020) Perceptions of purchasing and payment mechanisms in alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment services in Australia: a qualitative study involving AOD service providers and purchasers of treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review, 39, 189-197 https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13027, opens in a new window
- Ritter, A. & van de Ven, K. (2019) Is health or social welfare the right question? Response to commentaries. Drug and Alcohol Review, 38,129-130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dar.12900, opens in a new window
- Ritter, A. & van de Ven, K. (2019). Alcohol and other drug treatment commissioning and purchasing: Is it health care or social-welfare? Drug and Alcohol Review, 38, 119-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12871
- van de Ven, K., Ritter, A., & Roche, A. (2020). Alcohol and other drug (AOD) staffing and their workplace: examining the relationship between clinician and organisational workforce characteristics and treatment outcomes in the AOD field. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 27(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/09687637.2019.1622649
NHMRC
Co-investigators
- Timothy Dobbins (NDARC)
- Jennifer Chalmers (NDARC)
- Michael Livingston (La Trobe University)
- Lynda Berends (Trace Research)
- Harvey Whiteford (The University of Queensland)
The project is supported by an Advisory Group, which includes the following members:
- Sam Biondo – CEO, Victorian Alcohol And other Drug Association (VAADA)
- Helene Delany – Manager, Alcohol and other Drug Policy, ACT Health
- Adrian Dunlop – Addiction Medicine Specialist, NSW Ministry of Health
- Moira Hewitt – Head, Tobacco Alcohol and Other Drugs Unit. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
- Rebecca Lang – CEO, Queensland Network of Alcohol and Drug Agencies (QNADA)
- Ann Roche – Director, National Centre Education and Training on Addictions (NCETA)
- Ross Broad, A/Director, Drug Policy and Reform, Community Based Health Policy & Programs Branch, Department of Health and Human Services
- Helen Taylor, A/Director, Alcohol and Other Drugs Strategy, Planning & Partnerships Unit, Mental Health Alcohol & Other Drugs Branch, Department of Health
- Chris Killick-Moran, Director, Research and International Policy, Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs Branch, Population Health and Sport Division, Department of Health